Quote:
Originally Posted by theorym
Brad Callen is trying to show you all wrong in his video austin...Though the inanchor usage is wrong, all one needs to do is type in "bfmscript" in google and you get 4340 results. Im sure at least a 1000 of those are useful affiliates.
While this does automate it, it doesn't show the potential of any of these affiliates...
|
Hi guys, no, I'm not try to "prove anyone wrong". The purpose of the video was the clear up confusion.
2 points here:
1. I'm assuming when you state that I am using the inanchor command you mean I should be inputting: inanchor:bfmscript
Click on this link... and browse through the results. Most of the results bring back pages that contain the "text" bfmscript.hop.clickbank.net on the page, not an actual hyperlink... By inputting the command I showed in the video, it was atleast returning valid pages, even though there were fewer.
inanchor:bfmscript - Google Search
2. Go to Google, enter bfmscript. Then browse through the results. That will ONLY bring back pages that contain that text on the page. What if you're looking up an affiliate ID named something more common, like "weight loss"?
Click this link and browse through the results.
bfmscript - Google Search
Again, I was definitely NOT trying to prove anyone wrong. An inanchor search would bring back a few valid results and is certainly better than doing nothing. Just by coming up with that idea, you're smarter than the average Joe for sure :-) The purpose of the video was to avoid confusion.
Sorry Austin, I hope I didn't upset anyone, as that was definitely not my intention! I actually applaud you for coming up with something that will atleast pull some affiliates :-)
Brad